ODP Faces Backlash Over Vigil Poster Incident, Promises Internal Review and Apology
- Office Depot faced backlash after employees declined to print vigil posters for a politically sensitive memorial.
- The company conducted an internal review, leading to the termination of the involved employee and issued an apology.
- Office Depot emphasized corporate responsibility and the need for employee training on handling sensitive political requests.

Office Depot Responds to Backlash Over Vigil Poster Incident
Office Depot faces public scrutiny following a viral video that captures employees at its Portage, Michigan location declining to print posters for a memorial vigil honoring Charlie Kirk, the late founder of Turning Point USA. The incident, which has drawn over four million views on social media platform X, features a manager stating, “we don’t print propaganda,” when asked about the refusal. This incident has become a flashpoint for discussions surrounding corporate responsibility, employee conduct, and customer service, especially in the politically charged context of Kirk's recent death. He was fatally shot while speaking at an event for Turning Point USA, a conservative advocacy group that Kirk had significantly influenced.
In response to the backlash, Office Depot promptly initiates an internal review and announces that the employee involved in the incident is no longer with the company. The retailer expresses deep concern over what it describes as an "unfortunate customer experience," emphasizing that the behavior exhibited does not reflect the company’s values. The swift action taken underscores Office Depot’s commitment to addressing customer grievances, particularly amid the emotional and sensitive circumstances surrounding Kirk's legacy. By reaching out to the customer who requested the posters, the company seeks to rectify the situation and fulfill the original order, reinforcing their dedication to customer service.
The incident has incited a broader conversation about the responsibilities of corporations in politically charged environments. With Kirk’s influence on conservative activism and the growing calls for accountability from both supporters and detractors, Office Depot finds itself at the intersection of commerce and public sentiment. The company’s statement clarifies that the actions taken by its employees were against company policy, and it issues a sincere apology for the regrettable situation. This incident not only highlights the challenges faced by businesses in navigating customer requests that may touch on sensitive political topics but also illustrates the potential repercussions of employee behavior on a brand’s image.
As the public continues to react, the incident serves as a reminder of the importance of training employees in handling politically sensitive requests and ensuring that corporate policies align with customer expectations. Office Depot’s proactive approach in addressing the situation and reinforcing its commitment to customer satisfaction may serve as a lesson for other retailers facing similar challenges in an increasingly polarized environment.