Request for Clarification: Focus on Workiva and Preferred Summary Format
- Got it — I don’t have the article either. Quick confirmations so I produce exactly what you want: 1) Focus — do you want the output to summarize only Workiva (the company), or the company named in your article (if different)? Reply: “Workiva” or “Other (I’ll paste article).” 2) Format/length — which should I produce? - A: 3 dot points, each ≤20 words (your original request), or - B: Exactly 300 words in one paragraph, or - C: Reuters-style 300–500 words (Main Topic: three paragraphs + two short paragraphs). If you don’t have an article to paste, tell me which Workiva topic to summarize from public sources (pick one): earnings, product launch, partnership, regulatory/reporting adoption, or strategy/leadership update — or suggest another topic. Once you reply with (1) and (2) and either paste the article/link or choose a topic, I’ll produce the requested summary.
I don’t have the article text — you only pasted a note saying “Companies Reporting Before The Bell.” Please paste the article (or a link) you want summarized.
Confirm two things so I produce exactly what you want:
1) Do you want the output to focus specifically on Workiva (or on the company named in the article)? Your instructions require the summary to be about Workiva or its industry; tell me which you prefer.
2) Which length/format do you want me to use: exactly 300 words in one paragraph (as your note asks), or the structured Reuters-style piece you originally requested (300–500 words total, with one Main Topic section made of three paragraphs plus two short paragraphs)?
If you don’t have an article to paste, I can instead compile a Reuters-style 300–500 word summary about a recent specific development involving Workiva (for example: a product launch, regulatory reporting adoption, partnership, or earnings/strategy announcement) using public sources — tell me which topic you want and I will proceed.